United States v. Scophony Corporation of America
333 U.S. 795 · Decided April 26, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Scophony Corporation of America was decided on April 26, 1948 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Wiley B. Rutledge wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 333 U.S. 795 · 68 S. Ct. 855 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 1091 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2851
- Docket number
- 41
- Decided
- April 26, 1948
- Argued
- January 12, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Wiley B. Rutledge
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Scophony Corporation of America et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1947-070, docket 1947-070-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.
- United States v. Griffith
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United States
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.
- United States v. Line Material Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill
- International Salt Co., Inc. v. United States
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States
- Lillie v. Thompson
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana
- Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error