International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
358 U.S. 242 · Decided January 12, 1959 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States was decided on January 12, 1959 by a vote of 5–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mergers” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 358 U.S. 242 · 79 S. Ct. 245 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 270 · 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1930
- Docket number
- 18
- Decided
- January 12, 1959
- Argued
- November 13, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mergers
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Dissent |
Did not participate: Potter Stewart.
Full case caption
International Boxing Club of New York, Inc., et al. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-028, docket 1958-028-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mergers”
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States
- Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Association, Inc. v. United States
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United States
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- California v. Federal Power Commission
- Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Kelly v. Kosuga
- Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.
- Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
- United States v. Parke
- United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
- Wirl Television Corp. v. United States
- Deen v. Hickman
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error