Swarb v. Lennox
405 U.S. 191 · Decided February 24, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Swarb v. Lennox was decided on February 24, 1972 by a vote of 6–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Debtors' rights” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 191 · 92 S. Ct. 767 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 138 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 87
- Docket number
- 70-6
- Decided
- February 24, 1972
- Argued
- November 9, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Debtors' rights
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Swarb et al. v. Lennox et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-065, docket 1971-065-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Debtors' rights”
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. v. Frick Co.
- Lindsey v. NormetLaw held unconstitutional
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
- Fuentes v. ShevinLaw held unconstitutional
- Simmons et Ux. v. West Haven Housing Authority
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Altered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Smith v. Florida
- Rabe v. Washington
- Loper v. Beto
- In re Little
- Stanley v. IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error