Lindsey v. Normet
405 U.S. 56 · Decided February 23, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Lindsey v. Normet was decided on February 23, 1972 by a vote of 5–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Debtors' rights” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 56 · 92 S. Ct. 862 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 36 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 91
- Docket number
- 70-5045
- Decided
- February 23, 1972
- Argued
- November 15, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Debtors' rights
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Lindsey et al. v. Normet et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-056, docket 1971-056-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Debtors' rights”
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. v. Frick Co.
- Swarb v. Lennox
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
- Fuentes v. ShevinLaw held unconstitutional
- Simmons et Ux. v. West Haven Housing Authority
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Altered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Smith v. Florida
- Rabe v. Washington
- Loper v. Beto
- In re Little
- Stanley v. IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error