CaseTrail

Miss. ex Rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp.

571 U.S. 161 · Decided January 14, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Miss. ex Rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp. was decided on January 14, 2014 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Comity, removal cases and foreign tribunals” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
571 U.S. 161 · 134 S. Ct. 736 · 187 L. Ed. 2d 654 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 645
Docket number
12-1036
Decided
January 14, 2014
Argued
November 6, 2013
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sonia Sotomayor
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28-1332
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Miss. ex Rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp.

SCDB identifiers: case 2013-012, docket 2013-012-01.

Other cases on “Comity, removal cases and foreign tribunals”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28-1332

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error