South Dakota v. Wayfair
138 S. Ct. 2080 · Decided June 21, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
South Dakota v. Wayfair was decided on June 21, 2018 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-494
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 2080 · 201 L. Ed. 2d 403 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3835
- Docket number
- 17-494
- Decided
- June 21, 2018
- Argued
- April 17, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
South Dakota v. Wayfair
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-059, docket 2017-059-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family TrustLaw held unconstitutional
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneLaw held unconstitutional
- Ala. Dep't of Revenue v. CSX Transp., Inc.
- Direct Mktg. Ass'n v. Brohl
- Christine Armour v. City of Indianapolis
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. ThomasLaw held unconstitutional
- National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
- Haaland v. Brackeen
- United Haulers Association, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. and Usf Holland, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
- Jennifer M. Granholm v. Eleanor HealdLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- District of Columbia v. Wesby
- Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran
- Digital Realty Trust v. Somers
- Merit Management Group, Lp v. Fti Consulting, Inc
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Village at Lakeridge
- Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error