Jennifer M. Granholm v. Eleanor Heald
544 U.S. 460 · Decided May 16, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Jennifer M. Granholm v. Eleanor Heald was decided on May 16, 2005 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 544 U.S. 460 · 125 S. Ct. 1885 · 161 L. Ed. 2d 796 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 4174
- Docket number
- 03-1116
- Decided
- May 16, 2005
- Argued
- December 7, 2004
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- Antonin Scalia
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al. v. Eleanor Heald, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2004-045, docket 2004-045-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. and Usf Holland, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
- Hillside Dairy Inc. v. William J. Lyons, Jr.
- Michael Fitzgerald v. Racing Association of Central Iowa
- United Haulers Association, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Peter E. Walsh
- Yellow Transportation, Inc. v. Michigan
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Meadwestvaco Corporation v. Illinois Department of Revenue
- Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. George W. Davis
- South Central Bell Telephone Company v. AlabamaLaw held unconstitutional
- Camps Newfound/owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonLaw held unconstitutional
- General Motors Corporation v. Roger W. Tracy
- Fulton Corporation v. Janice H. FaulknerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. James N. Kirby
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Bradley Nigh
- Kp Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.
- Rochelle Brosseau v. Kenneth J. Haugen
- Willard Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error