North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust
139 S. Ct. 2213 · Decided June 21, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust was decided on June 21, 2019 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-457
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 2213 · 294 L. Ed. 2d 621 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4198
- Docket number
- 18-457
- Decided
- June 21, 2019
- Argued
- April 16, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Concurrence | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-071, docket 2018-071-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- South Dakota v. WayfairAltered precedent
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneLaw held unconstitutional
- Ala. Dep't of Revenue v. CSX Transp., Inc.
- Direct Mktg. Ass'n v. Brohl
- Christine Armour v. City of Indianapolis
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Kahler v. Kansas
- June Medical Services LLC v. RussoLaw held unconstitutional
- Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Escondido v. Emmons
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
- Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
- Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error