Slack Technologies v. Pirani
598 U.S. 759 · Decided June 1, 2023 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Slack Technologies v. Pirani was decided on June 1, 2023 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 598 U.S. 759 · 143 S. Ct. 1433 · 216 L. Ed. 2d 18 · 2023 U.S. LEXIS 2301
- Docket number
- 22-200
- Decided
- June 1, 2023
- Argued
- April 17, 2023
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Neil M. Gorsuch
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
Full case caption
Slack Technologies v. Pirani
SCDB identifiers: case 2022-051, docket 2022-051-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
- Liu v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Fs Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Salman v. United States
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
- Wilkins v. United States
- Moac Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
- National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
- Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith
- Gonzalez v. Google LLC
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error