Schilb v. Kuebel
404 U.S. 357 · Decided December 20, 1971 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schilb v. Kuebel was decided on December 20, 1971 by a vote of 4–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, costs or filing fees” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 404 U.S. 357 · 92 S. Ct. 479 · 30 L. Ed. 2d 502 · 1971 U.S. LEXIS 157
- Docket number
- 70-90
- Decided
- December 20, 1971
- Argued
- October 12, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–3
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, costs or filing fees
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Schilb et al. v. Kuebel et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-032, docket 1971-032-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, costs or filing fees”
- Huffman v. Boersen
- James v. StrangeLaw held unconstitutional
- Boddie v. ConnecticutLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Kras
- Ortwein v. Schwab
- Gaca v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
- Britt v. North Carolina
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Connor v. Williams
- Bullock v. CarterLaw held unconstitutional
- Dunn v. BlumsteinAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error