CaseTrail

Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Nick Lombardi v. Paul Casarotto et Ux.

517 U.S. 681 · Decided May 20, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Nick Lombardi v. Paul Casarotto et Ux. was decided on May 20, 1996 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
517 U.S. 681 · 116 S. Ct. 1652 · 134 L. Ed. 2d 902 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3244
Docket number
95-559
Decided
May 20, 1996
Argued
April 16, 1996
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Federalism
Legal provision
9 U.S.C. § 2
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Nick Lombardi v. Paul Casarotto et Ux.

SCDB identifiers: case 1995-055, docket 1995-055-01.

Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 9 U.S.C. § 2

Same Term, same area (Federalism)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error