Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
410 U.S. 719 · Decided March 20, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District was decided on March 20, 1973 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 719 · 93 S. Ct. 1224 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 659 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 10
- Docket number
- 71-1456
- Decided
- March 20, 1973
- Argued
- January 8, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Salyer Land Co. et al. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-080, docket 1972-080-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement District
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Gaffney v. Cummings
- White v. RegesterLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. WeiserLaw held unconstitutional
- Taylor v. McKeithen
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Altered precedent
- McGinnis v. Royster
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error