McGinnis v. Royster
410 U.S. 263 · Decided February 21, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
McGinnis v. Royster was decided on February 21, 1973 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 263 · 93 S. Ct. 1055 · 35 L. Ed. 2d 282 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 18
- Docket number
- 71-718
- Decided
- February 21, 1973
- Argued
- December 11, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
McGinnis, Commissioner of Correction, et al. v. Royster et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-052, docket 1972-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights”
- Hurtado v. United States
- Morrissey v. Brewer
- Marshall v. United States
- Younger v. Gilmore
- Arciniega v. Freeman, U.S. Marshal
- Wolff v. McDonnell
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Altered precedent
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement District
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Robinson v. HanrahanLaw held unconstitutional
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Jim
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United States
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- Hurtado v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error