Rosenbloom v. United States
355 U.S. 80 · Decided November 25, 1957 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Rosenbloom v. United States was decided on November 25, 1957 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Untimely filing” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 355 U.S. 80 · 78 S. Ct. 202 · 2 L. Ed. 2d 110 · 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1692
- Docket number
- 451
- Decided
- November 25, 1957
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Untimely filing
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Full case caption
Rosenbloom v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1957-011, docket 1957-011-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Untimely filing”
- Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co., Inc.
- Soriano v. United States
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
- Gardner v. Panama Railroad Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Mallory v. United States
- Giordenello v. United States
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
- Rea v. United States
- United States v. Robinson
- Jones v. United States
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Conleyv. Gibson
- Williams v. Simons
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
- Virginia v. Maryland
- Nelson v. Tennessee.
- Reeves v. Alabama.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error