Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
360 U.S. 395 · Decided June 22, 1959 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States was decided on June 22, 1959 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 360 U.S. 395 · 79 S. Ct. 1237 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 1323 · 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1906
- Docket number
- 489
- Decided
- June 22, 1959
- Argued
- April 28, 1959
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Felix Frankfurter
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Discovery and inspection in criminal cases
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-122, docket 1958-122-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases”
- Palermo v. United States
- Rosenberg v. United States
- Lev v. United States
- Campbell v. United States
- Scales v. United States.
- Lightfoot v. United States.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Robinson
- Jones v. United States
- Schaffer v. United States
- Giordenello v. United States
- Rosenbloom v. United States
- Green v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Hawkins v. United States
- Ladner v. United StatesAltered precedent
- United States ex Rel. Jennings v. Ragen
- Draper v. United States
- Greene v. United States
- Heflin v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error