Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co., Inc.
356 U.S. 335 · Decided April 28, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co., Inc. was decided on April 28, 1958 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Untimely filing” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 356 U.S. 335 · 78 S. Ct. 764 · 2 L. Ed. 2d 806 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1879
- Docket number
- 619
- Decided
- April 28, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Untimely filing
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Full case caption
Jung et al. v. K. & D. Mining Co., Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1957-086, docket 1957-086-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Untimely filing”
- Rosenbloom v. United States
- Soriano v. United States
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
- Wolfsohn v. Hankin
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, U.S. District Judge
- Sears v. Mackey
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Conleyv. Gibson
- Williams v. Simons
- Rosenbloom v. United States
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
- Virginia v. Maryland
- Nelson v. Tennessee.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error