Pavelic & Leflore v. Marvel Entertainment Group
493 U.S. 120 · Decided December 5, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Pavelic & Leflore v. Marvel Entertainment Group was decided on December 5, 1989 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 493 U.S. 120 · 110 S. Ct. 456 · 107 L. Ed. 2d 438 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 5832
- Docket number
- 88-791
- Decided
- December 5, 1989
- Argued
- October 2, 1989
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Pavelic & Leflore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, a Division of Cadence Industries Corp., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-010, docket 1989-010-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corporation
- Green v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.
- Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney
- Billy J. Temple v. Synthes Corporation, Ltd.
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. and Michael Shipp
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Martin v. Wilks
- Firstier Mortgage Company v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Company
- Houston v. Lack
- Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
- Amadeo v. Zant
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- James M. White, Etc. v. United States
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Richard Sperling
- Spallone v. United States
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp.Altered precedent
- Elizabeth Dole v. United Steelworkers of America
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error