Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney
489 U.S. 169 · Decided February 21, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney was decided on February 21, 1989 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 489 U.S. 169 · 109 S. Ct. 987 · 103 L. Ed. 2d 146 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 601
- Docket number
- 87-1201
- Decided
- February 21, 1989
- Argued
- November 29, 1988
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Osterneck et al. v. Ernst & Whinney
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-035, docket 1988-035-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey
- Green v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
- Pavelic & Leflore v. Marvel Entertainment Group
- Mercilyn Buchanan Etc. v. Stanships, Inc.
- Marino v. Ortiz
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Martin v. Wilks
- Houston v. Lack
- Amadeo v. Zant
- City of St. Louis v. James H. Praprotnik
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey
- Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
- Harbison-Walker Refractories v. Brieck
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.
- Mark H. Oring v. State Bar of California
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error