CaseTrail

Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corporation

496 U.S. 384 · Decided June 11, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corporation was decided on June 11, 1990 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
496 U.S. 384 · 110 S. Ct. 2447 · 110 L. Ed. 2d 359 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3088
Docket number
89-275
Decided
June 11, 1990
Argued
February 20, 1990
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
Type of law
Court rules
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corporation, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1989-107, docket 1989-107-01.

Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error