CaseTrail

Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

491 U.S. 164 · Decided June 15, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Patterson v. McLean Credit Union was decided on June 15, 1989 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
491 U.S. 164 · 109 S. Ct. 2363 · 105 L. Ed. 2d 132 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 2976
Docket number
87-107
Decided
June 15, 1989
Argued
February 29, 1988
Reargued
October 12, 1988
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Anthony M. Kennedy
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

SCDB identifiers: case 1988-115, docket 1988-115-01.

Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error