Nelson v. Colorado
137 S. Ct. 1249 · Decided April 19, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Nelson v. Colorado was decided on April 19, 2017 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1249 · 197 L. Ed. 2d 611 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2615
- Docket number
- 15-1256
- Decided
- April 19, 2017
- Argued
- January 9, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.
Full case caption
Nelson v. Colorado
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-033, docket 2016-033-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- Murr v. Wisconsin
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureLaw held unconstitutional
- Timbs v. Indiana
- Knick v. Township of ScottAltered precedent
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.
- Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams v. Pennsylvania
- Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.
- Murr v. Wisconsin
- Pavan v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error