CaseTrail

Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Freeman Ayers

538 U.S. 135 · Decided March 10, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Freeman Ayers was decided on March 10, 2003 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
538 U.S. 135 · 123 S. Ct. 1210 · 155 L. Ed. 2d 261 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 1956
Docket number
01-963
Decided
March 10, 2003
Argued
November 6, 2002
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Federal Employers' Liability Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Freeman Ayers et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-032, docket 2002-032-01.

Other cases on “Election of remedies”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Employers' Liability Act

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error