CaseTrail

Pierce County v. Ignacio Guillen

537 U.S. 129 · Decided January 14, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Pierce County v. Ignacio Guillen was decided on January 14, 2003 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Truck or motor carrier regulation” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
537 U.S. 129 · 123 S. Ct. 720 · 154 L. Ed. 2d 610 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 747
Docket number
01-1229
Decided
January 14, 2003
Argued
November 4, 2002
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
23 U.S.C. § 409
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Pierce County, Washington v. Ignacio Guillen, Legal Guardian of Jennifer Guillen and Alma Guillen, Minors, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-013, docket 2002-013-01.

Other cases on “Truck or motor carrier regulation”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error