CaseTrail

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. Celestine Garris

532 U.S. 811 · Decided June 4, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. Celestine Garris was decided on June 4, 2001 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
532 U.S. 811 · 121 S. Ct. 1927 · 150 L. Ed. 2d 34 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4125
Docket number
00-346
Decided
June 4, 2001
Argued
April 18, 2001
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. Celestine Garris, Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Garris, Deceased

SCDB identifiers: case 2000-065, docket 2000-065-01.

Other cases on “Election of remedies”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error