Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
449 U.S. 456 · Decided January 21, 1981 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. was decided on January 21, 1981 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 449 U.S. 456 · 101 S. Ct. 715 · 66 L. Ed. 2d 659 · 1981 U.S. LEXIS 14
- Docket number
- 79-1171
- Decided
- January 21, 1981
- Argued
- November 3, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1980-030, docket 1980-030-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of DelawareLaw held unconstitutional
- Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
- Lewis v. Bt Investment Managers, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Kirchberg v. FeenstraLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (California
- Ball v. James
- Williams v. Zbaraz
- Carey v. BrownLaw held unconstitutional
- Wengler v. Druggists Mutual Insurance Co.Law held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Association
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director
- Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Investment Company Institute
- Steadman v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Diamond v. Diehr
- Diamond v. Bradley
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error