CaseTrail

Edgar v. Mite Corp.

457 U.S. 624 · Decided June 23, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Edgar v. Mite Corp. was decided on June 23, 1982 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
457 U.S. 624 · 102 S. Ct. 2629 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 269 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 21
Docket number
80-1188
Decided
June 23, 1982
Argued
November 30, 1981
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Byron R. White
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Dissent
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Thurgood MarshallDissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerMajority
Justice Harry A. BlackmunMajority
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.ConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice William H. RehnquistDissentWrote an opinion
Justice John Paul StevensConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorConcurrenceWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Edgar v. Mite Corp. et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1981-136, docket 1981-136-01.

Other cases on “State or local business regulation”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error