Edgar v. Mite Corp.
457 U.S. 624 · Decided June 23, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Edgar v. Mite Corp. was decided on June 23, 1982 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 457 U.S. 624 · 102 S. Ct. 2629 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 269 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 21
- Docket number
- 80-1188
- Decided
- June 23, 1982
- Argued
- November 30, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Edgar v. Mite Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-136, docket 1981-136-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of DelawareLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Sporhase v. Nebraska ex Rel. DouglasAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaAltered precedent
- Container Corporation of America v. Franchise Tax Board
- Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Watt v. Energy Action Educational Foundation
- Central Trust Co. v. Official Creditors' Committee of Geiger Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Clark
- Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error