CaseTrail

Memphis Steam Laundry Cleaner, Inc. v. Stone

342 U.S. 389 · Decided March 3, 1952 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Memphis Steam Laundry Cleaner, Inc. v. Stone was decided on March 3, 1952 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
342 U.S. 389 · 72 S. Ct. 424 · 96 L. Ed. 2d 436 · 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2381
Docket number
253
Decided
March 3, 1952
Argued
December 3, 1951
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Fred M. Vinson
Opinion assigned by
Fred M. Vinson
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Memphis Steam Laundry Cleaner, Inc. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission

SCDB identifiers: case 1951-042, docket 1951-042-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error