Breard v. Alexandria
341 U.S. 622 · Decided June 4, 1951 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Breard v. Alexandria was decided on June 4, 1951 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Stanley F. Reed wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 341 U.S. 622 · 71 S. Ct. 920 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 1233 · 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1729
- Docket number
- 399
- Decided
- June 4, 1951
- Argued
- March 7, 1951
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Stanley F. Reed
- Opinion assigned by
- Stanley F. Reed
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority |
Full case caption
Breard v. Alexandria
SCDB identifiers: case 1950-092, docket 1950-092-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Standard Oil Co. v. New Jersey
- California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Maloney
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonLaw held unconstitutional
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma
- Buck v. California
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorLaw held unconstitutional
- Norton Company v. Department of Revenue of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- Memphis Steam Laundry Cleaner, Inc. v. StoneLaw held unconstitutional
- Capitol Greyhound Lines v. Brice
- City of Chicago v. Willett Company
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Fogarty v. United States
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States
- Libby v. United States
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
- Feres v. United States
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error