Lorain Journal Co. v. United States
342 U.S. 143 · Decided December 11, 1951 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lorain Journal Co. v. United States was decided on December 11, 1951 unanimously (7–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 342 U.S. 143 · 72 S. Ct. 181 · 96 L. Ed. 2d 162 · 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2488
- Docket number
- 26
- Decided
- December 11, 1951
- Argued
- October 17, 1951
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Did not participate: Tom C. Clark, Sherman Minton.
Full case caption
Lorain Journal Co. et al. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1951-016, docket 1951-016-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Hughes v. United States
- United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.
- United States v. Oregon State Medical Society
- Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- United States v. Employing Plasterers Association of Chicago
- United States v. Employing Lathers Association of Chicago and Vicinity
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United States
- International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
- Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- McMahon v. United States
- United States v. Fortier
- Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.
- United States v. Kelly
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.
- Carson v. Roane-Anderson Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error