Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic Party
457 U.S. 1 · Decided June 7, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic Party was decided on June 7, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Voting” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 457 U.S. 1 · 102 S. Ct. 2194 · 72 L. Ed. 2d 628 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 115
- Docket number
- 81-328
- Decided
- June 7, 1982
- Argued
- March 22, 1982
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Voting
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (association)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Rodriguez et al. v. Popular Democratic Party et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-107, docket 1981-107-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Voting”
- Rogers v. LodgeLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Mobile v. Bolden
- Williams v. Brown
- Hunter v. UnderwoodLaw held unconstitutional
- Holt Civic Club v. City of Tuscaloosa
- Hill v. StoneLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (association)
- Citizens Against Rent Control/coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleyLaw held unconstitutional
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeLaw held unconstitutional
- Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin ex Rel. La FolletteLaw held unconstitutional
- Roberts v. United States Jaycees
- Marchioro v. Chaney
- In re Primus
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Chardon v. Fernandez
- Ralston v. Robinson
- Polk County v. Dodson
- Blanding v. Dubose
- Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error