Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc.
526 U.S. 137 · Decided March 23, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc. was decided on March 23, 1999 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 526 U.S. 137 · 119 S. Ct. 1167 · 143 L. Ed. 2d 238 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2189
- Docket number
- 97-1709
- Decided
- March 23, 1999
- Argued
- December 7, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1998-036, docket 1998-036-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Esteban Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. George Windsor
- Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond
- Lloyd Henderson v. United States
- Robert J. Devlin v. Robert A. Scardelletti
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Teresa L. Cunningham v. Hamilton County
- United States v. Chris W. Beggerly
- Chad Weisgram v. Marley Company
- Semtek International Incorporated v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery
- Akos Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Sylvester Mosley v. United States
- Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala
- The Federal Republic of Germany v. United States
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error