Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery
532 U.S. 757 · Decided May 29, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery was decided on May 29, 2001 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 532 U.S. 757 · 121 S. Ct. 1801 · 149 L. Ed. 2d 983 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4114
- Docket number
- 00-6374
- Decided
- May 29, 2001
- Argued
- April 16, 2001
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery, Attorney General of Ohio, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2000-061, docket 2000-061-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous”
- Janet Reno v. Ziya K. Koray
- Homero Gonzalez v. United States
- Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant
- United States v. Humberto Alvarez-Machain
- United States v. Richard Wilson
- Peretz v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Semtek International Incorporated v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Akos Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
- Robert J. Devlin v. Robert A. Scardelletti
- Chad Weisgram v. Marley Company
- Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman v. Ricky Bell
- Esteban Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Christopher Artuz v. Tony Bruce Bennett
- Carl W. Cleveland v. United States
- City of Indianapolis v. James EdmondLaw held unconstitutional
- Paul L. Glover v. United States
- Christopher A. Lopez v. Randy J. Davis
- Illinois v. Charles McArthur
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error