Lloyd Henderson v. United States
517 U.S. 654 · Decided May 20, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lloyd Henderson v. United States was decided on May 20, 1996 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 517 U.S. 654 · 116 S. Ct. 1638 · 134 L. Ed. 2d 880 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3243
- Docket number
- 95-232
- Decided
- May 20, 1996
- Argued
- March 19, 1996
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Lloyd Henderson v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1995-054, docket 1995-054-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. George Windsor
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc.
- Esteban Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation
- Donald J. Willy v. Coastal Corporation
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Anthony Leo Stutson v. United States
- United States v. Chris W. Beggerly
- Teresa L. Cunningham v. Hamilton County
- Charlene Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
- Chad Weisgram v. Marley Company
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. Anthony A. Petrarca
- Alexis Lawrence v. Shirley S. Chater
- Anthony Leo Stutson v. United States
- John W. Behrens v. Robert J. Pelletier
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Lawrence Epstein
- Alan Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error