CaseTrail

Jill L. Brown v. Ronald L. Sanders

546 U.S. 212 · Decided January 11, 2006 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Jill L. Brown v. Ronald L. Sanders was decided on January 11, 2006 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
546 U.S. 212 · 126 S. Ct. 884 · 163 L. Ed. 2d 723 · 2006 U.S. LEXIS 760
Docket number
04-980
Decided
January 11, 2006
Argued
October 11, 2005
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Jill L. Brown, Warden v. Ronald L. Sanders

SCDB identifiers: case 2005-017, docket 2005-017-01.

Other cases on “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error