Hughes v. Oklahoma
441 U.S. 322 · Decided April 24, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hughes v. Oklahoma was decided on April 24, 1979 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, natural resources” in the Federalism area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 441 U.S. 322 · 99 S. Ct. 1727 · 60 L. Ed. 2d 250 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 35
- Docket number
- 77-1439
- Decided
- April 24, 1979
- Argued
- January 9, 1979
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, natural resources
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Hughes v. Oklahoma
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-080, docket 1978-080-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, natural resources”
- Sporhase v. Nebraska ex Rel. DouglasAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Etc.
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Department of Revenue of Washington v. Association of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesAltered precedent
- Lewis v. Bt Investment Managers, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- United States v. California
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of Labor
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error