South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke
467 U.S. 82 · Decided May 22, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke was decided on May 22, 1984 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, natural resources” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 467 U.S. 82 · 104 S. Ct. 2237 · 81 L. Ed. 2d 71 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 88
- Docket number
- 82-1608
- Decided
- May 22, 1984
- Argued
- February 29, 1984
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, natural resources
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent |
Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall.
Full case caption
South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke, Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources of Alaska, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-102, docket 1983-102-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, natural resources”
- Sporhase v. Nebraska ex Rel. DouglasAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Hughes v. OklahomaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Etc.
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Armco Inc. v. HardestyLaw held unconstitutional
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. TullyLaw held unconstitutional
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasLaw held unconstitutional
- Container Corporation of America v. Franchise Tax Board
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Taxation of Hawaii
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanAltered precedent
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Association, Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal Service
- Hayfield Northern Railroad Co., Inc. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error