City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey
437 U.S. 617 · Decided June 23, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey was decided on June 23, 1978 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 437 U.S. 617 · 98 S. Ct. 2531 · 57 L. Ed. 2d 475 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 37
- Docket number
- 77-404
- Decided
- June 23, 1978
- Argued
- March 27, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
City of Philadelphia et al. v. New Jersey et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-134, docket 1977-134-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausLaw held unconstitutional
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Department of Revenue of Washington v. Association of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesAltered precedent
- Hughes v. OklahomaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradyAltered precedent
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- County Board of Arlington County v. Richards
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error