Hicks v. Oklahoma
447 U.S. 343 · Decided June 16, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Hicks v. Oklahoma was decided on June 16, 1980 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 447 U.S. 343 · 100 S. Ct. 2227 · 65 L. Ed. 2d 175 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 114
- Docket number
- 78-6885
- Decided
- June 16, 1980
- Argued
- March 26, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Hicks v. Oklahoma
SCDB identifiers: case 1979-118, docket 1979-118-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”
- County Court of Ulster County v. Allen
- Addington v. Texas
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- United States v. Grayson
- Youngberg v. Romeo
- Memphis Light v. Craft
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Anderson v. Charles
- Beck v. AlabamaLaw held unconstitutional
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin
- Vitek v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vermont
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Andrus v. Allard
- Kaiser Aetna v. United States
- Vaughn v. Vermilion Corp.
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
- Rush v. Savchuk
- Vitek v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error