Jimenez v. Weinberger
417 U.S. 628 · Decided June 19, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Jimenez v. Weinberger was decided on June 19, 1974 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Rights of illegitimates” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 417 U.S. 628 · 94 S. Ct. 2496 · 41 L. Ed. 2d 363 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 77
- Docket number
- 72-6609
- Decided
- June 19, 1974
- Argued
- March 18, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Rights of illegitimates
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Jimenez et al. v. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-144, docket 1973-144-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Rights of illegitimates”
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mathews v. Lucas
- Norton v. Mathews
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (equal protection)
- Morton v. Mancari
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldLaw held unconstitutional
- Weinberger v. Salfi
- Frontiero et Vir v. RichardsonLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Kras
- Washington v. Davis
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- United States Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Hibi
- Dennett v. Hogan
- Department of Game of Washington v. Puyallup Tribe
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- O'Brien v. SkinnerLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error