EPA v. Eme Homer City Generation
572 U.S. 489 · Decided April 29, 2014 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
EPA v. Eme Homer City Generation was decided on April 29, 2014 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 572 U.S. 489 · 134 S. Ct. 1584 · 188 L. Ed. 2d 775 · 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3108
- Docket number
- 12-1182
- Decided
- April 29, 2014
- Argued
- December 10, 2013
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Air Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Did not participate: Samuel A. Alito Jr..
Full case caption
EPA v. Eme Homer City Generation
SCDB identifiers: case 2013-039, docket 2013-039-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Util. Air Regulatory Group v. EPA
- Doug Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center;
- Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District Petitioner v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- Sturgeon v. Frost
- United States Army Corp of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Air Act
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Engine Manufacturers Association and Western States Petroleum Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
- Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice
- Law v. Siegel
- Bg Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina
- Paroline v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error