Dolores M. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
522 U.S. 422 · Decided January 26, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Dolores M. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. was decided on January 26, 1998 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 522 U.S. 422 · 118 S. Ct. 838 · 139 L. Ed. 2d 849 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 646
- Docket number
- 96-1291
- Decided
- January 26, 1998
- Argued
- November 12, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Dolores M. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-025, docket 1997-025-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”
- Charles T. Robinson, Sr. v. Shell Oil Company
- Darlene Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.
- James O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corporation
- Roger Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
- Gary M. McKnight v. General Motors Corporation
- Barbara Landgraf v. Usi Film Products
Cases on the same legal provision: Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. v. Florida Board of RegentsLaw held unconstitutional
- Christine McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
- Robert D. Gilmer v. Interstate/johnson Lane Corporation
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Richard Sperling
- Lehman v. Nakshian
- Lorillard v. Pons
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Carson Lynn Brown v. R. Williams
- City of Monroe v. United States
- Murphy J. Foster, Jr. v. G. Scott LoveLaw held unconstitutional
- Lynne Kalina v. Rodney Fletcher
- South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
- Lorenzo Arteaga v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error