CaseTrail

David Conn and Carol Najera v. Paul L. Gabbert

526 U.S. 286 · Decided April 5, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

David Conn and Carol Najera v. Paul L. Gabbert was decided on April 5, 1999 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Governmental liability” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
526 U.S. 286 · 119 S. Ct. 1292 · 143 L. Ed. 2d 399 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2345
Docket number
97-1802
Decided
April 5, 1999
Argued
February 23, 1999
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
William H. Rehnquist
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

David Conn and Carol Najera v. Paul L. Gabbert

SCDB identifiers: case 1998-042, docket 1998-042-01.

Other cases on “Governmental liability”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error