CaseTrail

City of Chicago v. Jesus Morales

527 U.S. 41 · Decided June 10, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

City of Chicago v. Jesus Morales was decided on June 10, 1999 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
527 U.S. 41 · 119 S. Ct. 1849 · 144 L. Ed. 2d 67 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4005
Docket number
97-1121
Decided
June 10, 1999
Argued
December 9, 1998
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A municipal or other local ordinance
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistDissent
Justice John Paul StevensMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Antonin ScaliaDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Anthony M. KennedyConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice David H. SouterMajority
Justice Clarence ThomasDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgMajority
Justice Stephen G. BreyerConcurrenceWrote an opinion

Full case caption

City of Chicago v. Jesus Morales et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1998-069, docket 1998-069-01.

Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error