Nynex Corporation v. Discon
525 U.S. 128 · Decided December 14, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Nynex Corporation v. Discon was decided on December 14, 1998 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 525 U.S. 128 · 119 S. Ct. 493 · 142 L. Ed. 2d 510 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 8080
- Docket number
- 96-1570
- Decided
- December 14, 1998
- Argued
- October 5, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Nynex Corporation, et al. v. Discon, Incorporated
SCDB identifiers: case 1998-008, docket 1998-008-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- California Dental Association v. Federal Trade Commission
- State Oil Company v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan & Associates, Inc.Altered precedent
- Antony Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V Trinko
- United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Wayne K. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.
- El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng
- Jane M. Roberts v. Galen of Virginia, Inc.
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
- AT&T Corporation v. Iowa Utilities Board
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. Stanley I. Jacobson
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error