Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat
452 U.S. 458 · Decided June 17, 1981 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat was decided on June 17, 1981 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 452 U.S. 458 · 101 S. Ct. 2460 · 69 L. Ed. 2d 158 · 1981 U.S. LEXIS 113
- Docket number
- 79-1997
- Decided
- June 17, 1981
- Argued
- February 24, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Connecticut Board of Pardons et al. v. Dumschat et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1980-121, docket 1980-121-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, prisoners' and defendants' rights”
- Howe v. Smith
- Jago v. Van Curen
- Vitek v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
- Hewitt v. Helms
- Olim v. Wakinekona
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts General Hospital
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Little v. StreaterLaw held unconstitutional
- Watkins v. Sowders
- Smith v. Phillips
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithLaw held unconstitutional
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hague
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diego
- Howe v. Smith
- Dames & Moore v. Regan
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error