Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith
449 U.S. 155 · Decided December 9, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith was decided on December 9, 1980 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 449 U.S. 155 · 101 S. Ct. 446 · 66 L. Ed. 2d 358 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 157
- Docket number
- 79-1033
- Decided
- December 9, 1980
- Argued
- October 14, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc., et al. v. Beckwith, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Seminole County, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1980-012, docket 1980-012-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diego
- Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
- Dames & Moore v. Regan
- Kaiser Aetna v. United States
- Vaughn v. Vermilion Corp.
- Andrus v. Allard
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Agins et Ux. v. City of Tiburon
- Gurley v. Rhoden
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- General Box Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hague
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diego
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat
- Howe v. Smith
- Dames & Moore v. Regan
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error