Dixon v. Love
431 U.S. 105 · Decided May 16, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dixon v. Love was decided on May 16, 1977 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 105 · 97 S. Ct. 1723 · 52 L. Ed. 2d 172 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 82
- Docket number
- 75-1513
- Decided
- May 16, 1977
- Argued
- March 1, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Dixon, Secretary of State of Illinois v. Love
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-098, docket 1976-098-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro et Ux.
- Laing v. United States
- New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co.
- Leis v. Flynt
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Henderson v. Kibbe
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandLaw held unconstitutional
- Bounds v. Smith
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalLaw held unconstitutional
- Manson v. Brathwaite
- Patterson v. New York
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Moody v. Daggett
- Connally v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Codd v. Velger
- Bounds v. Smith
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
- Patterson v. New York
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error