Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States
434 U.S. 275 · Decided January 10, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States was decided on January 10, 1978 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 434 U.S. 275 · 98 S. Ct. 566 · 54 L. Ed. 2d 538 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 13
- Docket number
- 76-911
- Decided
- January 10, 1978
- Argued
- October 11, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Air Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-023, docket 1977-023-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill
- California v. United States
- United States v. New Mexico
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train
- City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Air Act
- Hancock v. Train
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
- Engine Manufacturers Association and Western States Petroleum Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- County Board of Arlington County v. Richards
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
- J. W. Bateson Co., Inc. v. United States ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error