California v. Southland Royalty Co.
436 U.S. 519 · Decided May 31, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
California v. Southland Royalty Co. was decided on May 31, 1978 by a vote of 4–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas producer regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 436 U.S. 519 · 98 S. Ct. 1955 · 56 L. Ed. 2d 505 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 30
- Docket number
- 76-1114
- Decided
- May 31, 1978
- Argued
- December 7, 1977
- Reargued
- April 17, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas producer regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Potter Stewart, Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
California et al. v. Southland Royalty Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-097, docket 1977-097-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas producer regulation”
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Shell Oil Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Moss
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. McCombs
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall
- Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Mid-Louisiana Gas Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- County Board of Arlington County v. Richards
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United States
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error