Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.
417 U.S. 380 · Decided June 10, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. was decided on June 10, 1974 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas producer regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 417 U.S. 380 · 94 S. Ct. 2315 · 41 L. Ed. 2d 141 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 22
- Docket number
- 72-1490
- Decided
- June 10, 1974
- Argued
- February 19, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas producer regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: Potter Stewart.
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-133, docket 1973-133-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas producer regulation”
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Moss
- California v. Southland Royalty Co.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Shell Oil Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Sunray Dx Oil Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. McCombs
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Merrill Lynch v. Ware
- North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.Altered precedent
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. National Association of Railroad Passengers
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet
- Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Co.
- Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error